No.1382[Reply]
What if I wanted to read more or less "contemporary" philosophers like Sartre, Beauvoir, Adorno, Deleuze, Zizek, Badiou, etc.. but don't have the time and, dare I say, sufficient interest to go through Kant, Plato, Aristotle, and all the other classical authors of philosophy? How much do I have to lose? I'm willing to spend a couple of months reading Plato, but I think I'm only willing to go through secondary sources for Aristotle. Same goes for the philosophers that predated the "contemporary" ones mentioned above. I'd be willing to read a history and primer on German idealism and maybe even read primary enlightenment texts if I have to.
So how much do I have to lose? People who are good at philosophy please answer.
16 posts and 3 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.>>
No.1442
>>1387t. theorylet
without philosophy there is no Marx
>>
No.4574
>>1387>political economySo shitty philosophy?
>>
No.4578
Thanks for the material in this thread guys, really good stuff.
>>
No.4582
>>4575I think it's good to practice any skill just on the threshold of difficulty, so my guess is that if you're in the process of learning French D&G might be not ideal. (They are, after all, often regarded as infamously unclear.) That's why my own French reading at this moment is just newspapers and popular histories. But if it works for you go for it.