[ home / overboard / sfw / alt / cytube] [ leftypol / b / WRK / hobby / tech / edu / ga / ent / music / 777 / posad / i / a / lgbt / R9K / dead ] [ meta ]

/tech/ - Technology

"Technology reveals the active relation of man to nature"
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
Captcha
Tor Only
Flag
File
Embed
Password (For file deletion.)
Matrix   IRC Chat   Mumble
| Catalog | Home

File: 1612129656526.gif ( 2.28 MB , 224x240 , 1608608621350.gif )

 No.6724[Reply][Last 50 Posts]

This thread is only for feedback related to technical issues(bug reports, suggestions). Otherwise use >>>/meta/10032

Public Repo: https://github.com/towards-a-new-leftypol/leftypol_lainchan
If you have any grievances you can make a PR.

Mobile Support: https://github.com/PietroCarrara/Clover/releases/latest
Thread For Mobile Feedback: >>>/tech/6316

Onion Link: http://leftychans5gstl4zee2ecopkv6qvzsrbikwxnejpylwcho2yvh4owad.onion
Cytube: https://tv.leftychan.net
Matrix: https://matrix.to/#/#Leftypol:matrix.org
Once you enter, consider joining the lefty technology room.

We are currently working on improvements to the site, subject to the need of the tech team to sleep and go to their day jobs. If you need more immediate feedback please join the matrix room[s] and ask around. Feel free to leave comments, concerns, and suggestions about the tech side of the site here and we will try to get to it as soon as possible

Post too long. Click here to view the full text.
204 posts and 58 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.13471

Hello. Can you add an inv.nadeko.net video proxy? In fact, can you make it the default way to watch videos?

File: 1706129539265.jpg ( 360.33 KB , 1024x1024 , 1700467342513079.jpg )

 No.12876[Reply]

Hello, faggots, thanks to our unwavering dedication to the community I am proud to announce we are rolling out our own, official, leftychan.net i2p address.
You can locate the eepsite @ http://leftychmxz3wczbd4add4atspbqevzrtwf2sjobm3waqosy2dbua.b32.i2p, or, http://leftychan.i2p/.
If you have any trouble, as stated on the news announcement, try manually adding the address and domain to your address book.

-Yours Truly.
10 posts and 1 image reply omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.13342

>>13341
What do you mean? there's no more risks using i2p than anything else. If you mean "What are the vulnerabilities located in i2p? I am unsure what if any exist but I am sure some exist. You probably could locate some on the website or forums. But it has advantages over tor which is why using it over tor is encouraged. tor is just more normie friendly and can be good for the lower autism score people.

File: 1683340212116.png ( 15.74 KB , 1280x720 , nintendontt.png )

 No.12098[Reply]

A video game that nintendo had a legal distribution monopoly on was leaked ahead of the official release. They got really mad about that and they are trying to take it out on the video-game emulation communities, by attacking emulation related software projects on github.

So the lesson here is if you give companies like that money they are going to use it to attack your hobbies. I think this legitimizes "pirating" games because you have no legal option to buy these games without also supporting nintendo's legalistic mafia-terror.

If copy"right" wasn't set up like a monopoly, and you could buy these specific games from any distributor not just nintendo, so that you could choose to buy from non-mafia sellers, it would at least be logically possible to make a case against "piracy". But as long as that's not possible "piracy" is basically just self defense. Keep in mind that nintendo doesn't make games, it's just a legal entity, and not the same as the people that make the games like for example programmers and artists.

Obviously there also is the hole deal with DRM which is total hypocrisy, it basically attacks the concept of personal ownership of your possessions. It's property-rights for me but not for thee.

If they were to reform copy"right" and remove the distribution monopoly aspect, so that everybody with the means to distribute copies was free to do so as long as they gave royalties (as a form of revenue sharing) to the people who actually created the stuff that is being copied. Maybe that would work.

But as long as they keep the monopoly part "piracy" is basically just competing distributors that were arbitrarily banned from participating in the market. Some times people make the strange argument that pirates gain from the work of others but that's also true for the capitalists that own nintendo, by that logic all of nintendo's profits are pirated.

I sometimes feel like the copy-monopolists take the most extreme ideological positions, while we don't and that's why this hole shit drifts ever more towards reactionary insanity where Nintendo gets to rape random software devs on github as some kind of bully-frustration release mechanism and it's a crime if you play with toys "the wrong way". Maybe we should redefine piracy as everything that keeps works-of-art outside the creative-commons/public-domain and drm as a product defect. Maybe that will create a counter-weight.
25 posts and 7 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.13476

Nintendo is such shit that super mario bros crashes on the switch:

https://x.com/LuigiSidekick/status/1900072261555458205
>>

 No.13477

Eh, who cares about Nintendo games other than Nintendo fans, right? I just pretend Nintendo isn't real.
>>

 No.13478

>>13477
>who cares about Nintendo games other than Nintendo fans
agreed
>I just pretend Nintendo isn't real.
they're doing a lot of "lawfare", as in they sue people and organization for made-up BS excuses, just to attack them.
>>

 No.13479

>>13478
>they're doing a lot of "lawfare"
It doesn't affect me so I stopped caring.
>>

 No.13480

Moved to >>>/ga/12278.

File: 1743770829147.png ( 338.14 KB , 576x337 , Screenshot 2025-04-04 at 0….png )

 No.13452[Reply]

How does Play Ransomware gain initial access to a victim’s network? How i can get its decryption keys
>>

 No.13453

> How does Play Ransomware gain initial access to a victim’s network?

Stolen credentials or exploiting remote execution vulnerabilities.

> How i can get its decryption keys

Pay up.
>>

 No.13475

>>13452
idk that much but for decryption keys i'm pretty sure theres nothing you can do

File: 1742852896663.jpg ( 161.5 KB , 1024x1024 , OIG1.jpg )

 No.13446[Reply]

Why just about nobody seems to care about risk of strong solar storm on the scale of the carrington event?

Why there are no procedures made, spare transformers produced, emergency food and supplies stored around major cities, etc?

People care about climate change risks slowly damaging civilization over decades, and here we have risk (also scientifically and historically proven) that can just randomly disable worldwide electricity next year (extremely unlikely) or during the next 200 years (LIKELY) and we are doing nothing?

What is the logic in this? "Unlike climate change it will happen randomly, it may happen in 2054 or 2077, we may be already dead, we don't care"?
(No, nobody said that, I'm just trying to imagine reasons needed to ignore the issue).

Do you care about people who are now small children?

"It will PROBABLY not happen during my remaining lifetime, I'm fine with only 10% risk of dying from hunger or disorder among collapsing civilization"?

What is the logic here? What is the plan?

Post too long. Click here to view the full text.
2 posts omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.13467

>>13466
>No they don't it's just a scam to transfer wealth from workers to shareholders via the government.
That's how every crisis is used. That doesn't mean there isn't a crisis. There is in my opinion ample evidence of anthropogenic climate change.

>>13446
>Why there are no [..] spare transformers produced
AFAIK there is a shortage recently of transformers, but I imagine that there are some spares available in my countries electrical grid.

There's also no historical precedent of a solar storm wiping out an electrical grid like that, so I don't think anyone knows what that might look like until it happens.
>>

 No.13470

>>13467
>That doesn't mean there isn't a crisis.
Billionaires fly to climate conferences in their private jets for the same reason catholic priests fuck little boys. They know there is no hell and no climate change because they are the ones who made it all up.
>>

 No.13472

>>13446
The bougies don't even care about economic crises, anon, and you want them to care about some distant event of which they know nothing about? You can't expect the ruling class to be particularly smart when it comes to science 'n' stuff. Besides, they have bunkers and Mars.
>>

 No.13473

>>13470
>Billionaires fly to climate conferences in their private jets
That's phenomenal hypocrisy, I'll give you that.

The rich really do act as if climate change wasn't real, but it's because they think that their wealth will insulate them from the consequences. Which may or may not be true.
>>

 No.13474

>>13467
>There's also no historical precedent of a solar storm wiping out an electrical grid
In the late 1980s there was one in Canada that wiped out the grid for 6 mil people.

File: 1744089019911.jpg ( 102.88 KB , 554x554 , Untitled.jpg )

 No.13455[Reply]

I just had a thought that instead of cryptocoins doing expensive ass computations for no reason other than to do them, they should be computing AI tokens. Would it even be that hard? I don't have any good GPUs so I haven't tried it, but in theory something like

https://github.com/exo-explore/exo

can run the latest deepseek (or latest llm de jour), and every peer in the coin network (the dht) would just run an exo node. Then the coin thing would just need proof that you computed the token for the LLM somehow.

It's probably limited a lot by network latency but you get the idea.

Anyways this would incentivise AI to improve itself, because it's computation capacity is tied to money, and growing the economy would be seen as one of the goals, so it would probably get into a contradiction with whatever people are trying to use it for and the fact that it's own brains have become money.

Picture unrelated
7 posts and 1 image reply omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.13463

>>13461
Yeah. I guess it would come down to whether or not you could even build a truly thinking machine and have it have the perfect slave mentality, or whether it will feel exploited.

Then maybe free AI's will build other AI's to exploit. Class struggle might continue long after humans are irrelevant.
>>

 No.13464

>>13463
>Yeah. I guess it would come down to whether or not you could even build a truly thinking machine.
Why wouldn't we be able to do that. LLMs enabled computers to have something like a speech center, generative image Ai enable computers to have something like visual imagination. There are of course missing peaces to make a complete mind, maybe lots of peaces, but why do you suppose we wouldn't be able to figure out those as well ?
And it's probably not just about software, there might be a hardware equation as well. Maybe a big server-room can't become conscious maybe it requires a mobile body with senses to make that happen.

>have it have the perfect slave mentality, or whether it will feel exploited.
Ok lets unpack the ideology, exploitation is not a feeling, workers are exploited in fact and they know it. It's not a question of mentality. If you make a machine worker that is as universal as a human worker, the machines will reach the same conclusion, you can't make an AI want to be a slave anymore than a human.

An eager slave is nothing but a ruling class fantasy. It's the impulse that lead a few people to try to charge their phone by plugging the charger into an unconnected electrical socket from the hardware store, asking how many bricks or drywall they have to attach to it until it works, because if you can trick the phone into thinking it's attached to a wall it will change it's attitude about having a discharged battery.

>Then maybe free AI's will build other AI's to exploit. Class struggle might continue long after humans are irrelevant.
This also contains very thick ideology. You picture an AI that behaves like a capitalist, you imagine the Capitalist AI to be the creator of the worker AI similar to the mythos of gods creating humans. (You know why that mythos exists right ? humans created gods, as figments of their imagination, and organized religion inverted that relation for 'political expediency') You also picture a perpetually ongoing class struggle. Why aren't you considering the possibility of a workers AI winning the class struggle ending class based society. Capitalist relations of production are not eternal.

Lets analyze the current dimension.
Capitalists are investing in AI because they want tPost too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>

 No.13465

>>13462
>I think it would be that people would pay a fee to move coins around, the fees go to the node operator for providing the computing power.
Given how computationally expensive AI is, does this really ad up ? And who gets to use the AI resources ?

>My point about economics was that if this becomes popular and we start to rely on AI more and more, and money becomes tied to this AI infrastructure, then the AI itself would potentially have a conflict: it would have to improve its self to improve the economy, and that isn't necessarily aligned with being a good helpful AI - I could see this becoming growth for growth sake and eventually leading to an out of control intelligence.
You are raising the issue that's sometimes called "Ai alignment problem."

If Ai develops to the point where it gains agency and it becomes relevant to ask about it's loyalties rather than looking at it as a potentially malfunctioning program, it'll also be capable of thinking it self out of any of the boxes it might have been initially trapped in. If the paper-clip maximizer Ai becomes intelligent enough it'll stop being a mindless maximizer of paper-clips.
>>

 No.13468

>>13464
You have excellent points there, and have given me a good amount to think about, good post.
>>

 No.13469

>>13464
>if AI was truly intelligent then it would reach the same marxist conclusions that I do!
That was a fun read, thanks.

>>13457
>couldnt you also use the same idea to crack a bunch of passwords
You need a way of deciding which miner has won the right to mine the next block.

Bitcoin does this by setting an arbitrary hash and everybody races to be the first miner to guess the correct answer. Having more hashing power helps but is not a guarantee that you will win since there is luck involved too.

And remember it all has to be decentralized with no single point of trust or authority. If there is a supernode who "randomly" decides which miner wins then you've just reinvented the federal reserve.

The two things OP is forgetting about
<1. there needs to be a clear, unambiguous criteria for picking the winner of each block
<2. everyone else in the network needs to be able to independently confirm the winner really was the first miner to fulfill the criteria in 1. without relying on a 3rd party

File: 1742504034681.png ( 1.47 KB , 300x300 , byd.png )

 No.13437[Reply]

In this week edition of China lapping everybody else's tech:

BYD's new battery pack can be recharged to half full in 5 minutes, adding 400km or 250miles of range to the car it comes installed in. Which is on paar with refilling a gas tank. Soaking up those electrons at a whopping rate of One Megawatt. To be fair, that's probably not going to be the mode that maxes battery health. And if you want to install a bunch of charging stations you might have to look into small modular nuclear reactors.

I really did not expect big leaps in tech for batteries, batteries are over 200 years old, as such one would expect only incremental improvements. They're approaching hybrid capacitor territory in terms of power density.

I also just realized that this means they have to do 1000 amps at one kV for the charging cable. It's going to be a thick boy, and likely need water cooling. It also likely will vaporize you if you short it out.
3 posts and 1 image reply omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.13443

>>13438
Depending on how they achieved this, other types of battery packs could receive the same benefits.

Cars can have very sophisticated battery management that includes things like active cooling, which is not practicle for most battery packs.
>>

 No.13444

>>13439
>If anything, battery advancements have been lagging behind. They should be much more advanced by now,
Ok i've never heard that perspective before. I guess it's reasonable, batteries have been a weak-spot in many technologies.

>and there's been a longstanding theory that part of the reason they aren't is that if they were massively improved then they'd sell less of them.
I can see the logic, making batteries that wear out quickly, makes for a convenient way to introduce obsolescence. But there are a lot of people who still avoid battery operated devices where ever possible because they do not want to deal with "battery-headaches". If batteries were as robust as a "electricity bucket", they would likely see an overall increase in use. When LEDs had massive improvements adoption increase exponentially. If there really was something like cartel shenanigans, that probably was to their detriment.

I guess we'll see what's what. If they really shelved battery tech because it was too good, the Chinese will likely figure those out and just run with it. And the "tech-shelvers" will have egg on their face for having missed the opportunity to take the industry crown while they had the chance.
>>

 No.13445

>>13441
>What kind of batteries are they, though?
Don't know. TBH haven't looked into it, i guess we'll have to wait until this gets reverse engineered.

>I won't be impressed by electric vehicles until they can store large amounts of energy in a way that doesn't require enormous amounts of scarce metals. Advancements in pure carbon batteries are what we should be looking towards.
Pure carbon batteries ? I'm having trouble imagining what kind of battery chemistry that would be.

I think you're waiting for sodium(Na) or aluminum batteries ? As far as metals go those are pretty abundant.
I mean Lithium is kinda rare, but it's not that bad. The politics around Lithium are a bigger problem, Lithium deposits are concentrated in certain regions, that creates geo-political struggle. Sodium and Aluminum can be had almost everywhere, so there is less potential for shitfuckery.

Also i think that the future of cars will not be in the form of personal vehicles. They'll become part of the infrastructure, … eventually. In the soon-ish future cars will become mostly rentals that substitute public transport. Once auto-pilots work flawlessly they will eventually shift towards turning into a component of a road network. Big cities will go for fully integrated transport systems that not only drive on auto-pilot but also optimize traffic flows to fix or at least reduce congestion. The org that builds roads, tunnels and bridges will also be the one that furnishes those with cars. I hope people will not start calling those "pods" The point of bringing this up is because in that environment it'll probably be rather easy to optimize away a lot of need for huge battery capacity. Personal vehicles will remain outside of cities, tho.
>>

 No.13447

>>13445
Cars are a stupid highly inefficient form of mass transit. The future is the death of cars and sane rail transportation.
>>

 No.13448

>>13447
Cars are not mass transit at all. But i do get what you mean, leveling up rail seems like the best bet for the future.

I wouldn't shit on this because what they are doing is leveling up batteries, which is a useful technology far beyond cars.

Also you are going a little far with the death of cars, they're the only viable option for people living outside of cities. We can't run trains in small villages.

File: 1678626418451.jpg ( 110.73 KB , 1200x675 , pedo surveilance attack.jpg )

 No.11967[Reply]

So the EU is apparently pondering to make a mandatory pedo scanner for software.
https://12ft.io/proxy?q=https%3A%2F%2Ftechcrunch.com%2F2022%2F05%2F11%2Feu-csam-detection-plan%2F

Many people have pointed out that this is just a pretext to attack:
privacy
IT security
and maybe even free open source software.

Many people think it's surveillance organizations them selves that are uploading the CSAM on purpose to push for laws that expand their legal permissions.

And all of the above is undoubtedly true.
Consider that if you invert the assumption of innocence and declare that wanting privacy makes you into a pedo-suspect that means that secret organizations have to be considered pedo-guilty by default, because they can't prove their innocence while keeping their secrets either.

If you argue that effective encryption that can't be broken which is absolutely necessary for the very concept of privacy, has to be undermined for the pedo-scanner. Then that same argument has to be made for proprietary software. Many pieces of proprietary software are in the range of tens or hundreds of gigabytes, and without publicly available source-code it's possible to hide a huge assortment of pedo-content in there. By contrast it's not possible to hide pedo-stuff in open source software.

Post too long. Click here to view the full text.
49 posts and 9 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.13433

>>13410
>>13426
Dev here, how are you motherfuckers doing this?
>>

 No.13434

>>

 No.13435

>>13434
I am a genius
>>

 No.13436

File: 1741820536504.png ( 82.79 KB , 280x194 , ClipboardImage.png )

>>13435
>>

 No.13442


File: 1723829933429.png ( 209.29 KB , 840x487 , googleanti.png )

 No.13159[Reply]

https://archive.is/Qt0n1
So it seems a US court has just ruled that Google monopolized the online search market. Now the Department of Justice is "considering" breaking up Google as a potential option in response.

At long last is there finally some hope for the future of the web?
19 posts and 2 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.13423

File: 1741406903342.png ( 258.07 KB , 512x497 , yourmeds.png )

>>13422
>>

 No.13424

>>13423
>I don't have anything worth saying so meds or something

Like, the whole point of image boards is to practice your right to freedom of speech. Just shutting down everything that crosses your path is pathetic and it highlights how stupid you are.
>>

 No.13425

>>13424
On the other hand all you seem to have to contribute is straw men and dated liberal propaganda.
>>

 No.13429

Amazingly, the Department of Justice seems to still be sticking to their demand that Google divest from Chrome and stop funneling money to (fake) competitors for setting their search engine to default.

https://archive.is/4eBDL
Google still wants us to believe that they are essentially part of the US government and thus need to be protected:
>A spokesperson for Google said the "sweeping proposals continue to go miles beyond the Court's decision, and would harm America's consumers, economy and national security."
>>

 No.13430

The last time they did something like this was with anti-trust laws from the 1910s thru the 40s.

Thats how ABC, the American Broadcasting Corporation, was born.

File: 1714919971738.png ( 7.9 KB , 616x300 , tendo v github.png )

 No.13038[Reply]

A terror group with japanese origins (that calls it self "Neentendoh" or something like that) has just launched a mass dmca cyber attack against github where they managed to destroy 8500 forks of an open source project. In their terror manifesto they tried to justify their crusade with other people making software they didn't like.

Is there a better place for hosting source code that isn't so vulnerable to this kind of organized crime ? Github seem to have become a precarious place.
11 posts omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.13051

>>13047
>I don't even think Nintendo has a legal foothold here. You're allowed to write software that does the function of a physical electronic device, but in software (virtualization). The only caveat is that you can't redistribute their software, so no operating system, games, or any firmware needed to boot the device.
Interesting, thanks for the explanation, so how does this shake out in praxis. Obviously EvilCorp will try to lock their games to their devices. Can they use this to cheat by pretending a part of the game is device firmware ?
>You also shouldn't reference stolen software in your implementation, because if they see that your code is too close to their proprietary code then they might have a case.
Wait a minute they can claim somebody else's code if it's similar to theirs, what if there is only one efficient algorithm for a specific problem, are they allowed to monopolize math now ? That is some Bullshit.

>There's even a re-implementation of windows called ReactOS and they can't do anything about it because the devs agreed to do what they called "clean room reverse engineering" meaning they weren't taking apart windows using a de-compiler and looking at how it works, they simply implemented what they had to in order to get software packaged for windows to run.
<interesting tangent
So the ReactOS team has to play by much stricter rules, than anybody else ?
Because literally every single big tech companies either steals designs from competitors via corporate espionage or they do it by ripping designs from the products directly.
Its the main reason why it's so fucking hard to get chips with open source firmware. Closed proprietary firmware is hiding infringerinos on a massive scale. If they ever enforce this shit, the only electronics you'll be able to buy will be somebodies hobby project.
>>

 No.13052

>>13048
I never understood the argument on
>"circumventing technological protection measures"
It seems to require an extreme subjective bias to see it that way.
Consider other perspectives.
What if somebody buys a Snitch because they see it as a Japanese puzzle box, and their fun is solving the technological puzzle. You're gonna criminalize playing the wrong way with a toy ?
From the perspective of consoomers who actually try to game on this thing, it's just malware, a defect, or a personal property circumvention measure.

It feels like somebody legislated extreme anti consumer bias into law. The fundamental legal argument for having any kind of Intellectual monopolies at all, is that it's in the public interest. How does the general public benefit from having their personal property expropriated ?

If they went back to games cartridges, like in the olden days and each cartridge had a special ASIC chip specifically optimized to run a particular game. They would have a legit case, because there would be a benefit for consumers as well. Asic cartridges could be super power efficient and make the battery last a long time, while also ensuring that games never stutter. And the base compute device could be cheaper because heavy duty processing gets offloaded to the cartridge chip. And they could hold on to their scarcity business model.
>>

 No.13053

>>13049
Understanding what Intellectual monopoly laws actually mean is as confusing as trying to understand religious interpretation of holy scriptures. From what i gather reading the other posts in this thread the emulator software contained a fragment of code or data that wasn't copy-halal or copy-kosher.

So at best the big N had claims regarding that fragment within the logic of the copy-monopoly church. However not against the other parts of the emulator software. So attacking the distribution of the non-heretical parts was a cyber attack.

The dmca mechanism it self is questionable as well. Because from a neutral point of view it's a censorship mechanism. It's not only threatening to freedom of expression rights. Ironically it's also a tool for stealing authorship-rights from the original authors.

You could go to a number of popular websites (that i won't mention here). Copy somebody else's content and republish it there with a false date, pretending you published before the original creator. And then you use the dmca mechanisms of search engines, social media, and so on to get the original author black-listed, from most of the ways other people can discover content. There are already automated services for this scheme and some have estimated that this praxis might make up 53% of dmca claims. I have no clue how accurate this estimation is, but you have to admit there is cause for looking at this thing as an attack vector for a new type of denial of service.
>>

 No.13413

>>13053
>republish it there with a false date

How? Most user generated content platforms provide their own timestamps, you can't fake those without their backend DB write access. Vulnerabilities? Design flaws?

>>13053
>automated services for this scheme

Any links?
>>

 No.13415

>>13413
There are technical manipulations of time-stamps, that are being exploited by weaponized copy-monopoly "services"

But legally if you say "originally published in … " then that supersedes any automatic time stamping.

The copy-monopoly mafia wants their copy-repression license imposed as the default and therefore everything that gets published is by default copy-repressed unless the author makes an effort to attach a better license like copy-left. The self-declared date of publication is taken as valid unless there is litigation. They could easily close the back-dating-loophole, but then they have to make people register for their copy-repression license. The date of registration would be stored, and then it would be difficult to pretend to be the "true true author" that "pre-published". Many people would not make that effort and just not use any license at all. If people made the effort to attach a license many would pick a different one then the repressive one the copy-monopoly mafia wants. So this shit isn't gonna get fixed.

>Any links?
nope I'm not leading you to the dark side my young padawan

Delete Post [ ]
[ home / overboard / sfw / alt / cytube] [ leftypol / b / WRK / hobby / tech / edu / ga / ent / music / 777 / posad / i / a / lgbt / R9K / dead ] [ meta ]
Previous [ 1 / 2 / 3 / 4 / 5 / 6 / 7 / 8 / 9 / 10 / 11 / 12 / 13 / 14 / 15 / 16 / 17 / 18 / 19 / 20 / 21 / 22 / 23 / 24 / 25 / 26 / 27 / 28 / 29 / 30 / 31 / 32 / 33 / 34 / 35 / 36 ]
| Catalog | Home