[ overboard / sfw / alt / cytube] [ leftypol / b / WRK / hobby / tech / edu / ga / ent / music / 777 / posad / i / a / R9K / dead ] [ meta ]

/777/ - Weapons and War

"An oppressed class which does not strive to learn to use arms, to acquire arms, only deserves to be treated like slaves" - V. I. Lenin
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
Captcha
Tor Only

Flag
File
Embed
Password (For file deletion.)

Matrix   IRC Chat   Mumble

| Catalog | Home

File: 1706825348683.png ( 856.14 KB , 1320x862 , 871c2e71cded7486aaacdbea18….png )

 No.1431[Reply]

It has been decided that the new theme for this board will be the discussion of weapons, warfare and military history.
As ever, we ask you to stick to the rules, including remembering to clearly mark any posts generated by AI as being so. Enjoy!


File: 1743097993318.png ( 70.37 KB , 300x200 , ClipboardImage.png )

 No.1517[Reply]

I love flankers. Post sexy planes so I can jerk off.
>>

 No.1518

>>1517
Yeah it's probably the last one of the truly good looking jets.

if you look at the R&D prototypes it appears that what comes after is increasingly going towards featureless flying wings.
>>

 No.1519

I'm so hard right now post more planes plz


File: 1742657783563.jpeg ( 108.17 KB , 735x1003 , 1727873227341.jpeg )

 No.1512[Reply]

Low-risk activities are great to know because they can be used in a mass movement filled with people who are (understandably) timid and scared. And once there are enough people on board, then there's the safety in numbers that are needed to build confidence for more extreme actions.

Perhaps more self-sabotage than worker sabotage, but I remember in the US post-pandemic strike wave, John Deere hired scabs and one crashed a tractor before the strike even began.

Speaking of scabs and low-risk tactics, Kellogg's also hired scabs that year and the /r/antiwork community raided them with fake job applications. It's a nice example of external sabotage, where sometimes even international comrades can help in their spare time.
>>

 No.1514

aye yo bro fuck tesla.
>>

 No.1515

Fuck Elon Musk
>>

 No.1516

I've got some perfectly good plans to start work on, but I have no idea how to finance said work.


File: 1740812263695.jpg ( 36.1 KB , 987x551 , semi auto shotgun.jpg )

 No.1506[Reply]

Semi-automatic shotguns - what's the verdict? Are they good? Which ones are the best?
>>

 No.1507

In video games the old-timey double-barrel shotgun is usually the best.

Can you explain what a semi-auto shotgun is for ?
Usually people use shotguns for hunting, so is this for mowing down an entire flock of birds or decimating an entire pack of wild bore ?
>>

 No.1508

>>1507
>Can you explain what a semi-auto shotgun is for ?
>Usually people use shotguns for hunting, so is this for mowing down an entire flock of birds or decimating an entire pack of wild bore ?
Say you're beset upon by a squadron of rhinoceri or something like that. You want more than just a couple shots, and the high caliber slugs of a shotgun will enable you to better break through the thick hides. Alternating between slugs and buckshot could also be useful for rapidly hitting many targets.
>>

 No.1509

Anyone have any recs?
>>

 No.1510

>>1508
>Say you're beset upon by a squadron of rhinoceri
Yes, the good ol rhino squadron.
>the thick hides
A shotgun prolly just piss off a rhino.
>>

 No.1511

>>1510
>A shotgun prolly just piss off a rhino.
Nah, a 12 gauge slug will probably penetrate 'em.


File: 1735115701582-0.png ( 3.36 MB , 1190x1555 , Black Book Volume 3.png )

File: 1735115701582-1.pdf ( 714.51 KB , 67x118 , Cobalt-60 - Wikipedia.pdf )

 No.1504[Reply]

Cobalt-60 could be made by irradiating a regular cobalt with an alpha neutron source, possibly?


File: 1707331984839.png ( 784.64 KB , 960x615 , benelli-m4-18076.png )

 No.1457[Reply]

How overrated is this shotgun, if at all?
12 posts and 2 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.1482

>>1478
Can shotguns shoot nets? Nets would probably be better at taking down a drone
>>

 No.1483

>>1482
how would you set up a net if you're mobile? they have their place for stuff like a window but you can always be canvassed in a giant net
>>

 No.1484

>>1482
oh you mean can shotguns shoot nets out of the barrel: no. Net guns exist but they're only good out to a few yards. I don't think a net shotgun is possible due to drag limitations and ability to actually deploy the net instead of it being a flaccid tail behind some shot. The shells would also have to be ludicrous in size. Not worth the effort just destroy the drone or begin the difficult task of developing an illegal signal jammer.
>>

 No.1485

>>1482
>>1484
If you can make a shotgun shell that operates like a flakcannon round with a proximity fuse, that deploys the net when it senses it's near a drone, that might work.

Since the net isn't deployed right away there would be no problems with drag. And it would retain useful range and accuracy.

I wonder if it's possible to modify the formula for silly-string to give it better tensile strength and use that as the "net".
>>

 No.1498

The benellis are absurdly reliable, the marines are known for breaking a lot of stuff, but even they can't make one of these stop running. But it's more expensive than they should, and if aren't LE/Military they come as barebones as it gets, the mossberg 940 is also very reliable and costs half


File: 1723561780469.jpg ( 200.64 KB , 800x965 , Golde33443.jpg )

 No.1496[Reply]

>>

 No.1497

Moved to >>>/b/154890.


File: 1707031894510.png ( 442.28 KB , 888x888 , 1707031640092.png )

 No.1440[Reply]

- Guns You Can Buy General -
Post guns that you want to buy or have already. Eurocucks welcome as is discussion of regulation.
20 posts and 9 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.1488

File: 1713990078677.jpg ( 17.99 KB , 1000x311 , 84310.jpg )

>>1487
I like how they make AR-15s that look like this. No idea how reliable they are though.
>>

 No.1489

>>1487
The saber is a great starter rifle that enables you to practice on the platform while also having enough for ammo. If you're super budget though I'd recommend a pistol caliber carbine in 9mm that's not an ar9. Don't buy a .22lr because those are just toys or for niche small game like squirrels and shit. Buy a real gun then if you are too poor keep 200rds of ammo for your real gun then buy a 22 for practice. There's some 22lr bolt carrier groups you can get to practice on an ar platform too. There's almost no reason to buy a 22
>>

 No.1490

File: 1713991629210.jpg ( 9.22 KB , 546x546 , 5165448152_082923_1.jpg )

>>1488
Nice get lol. Anyways these look cool but lack modern amenities. You'll end up replacing the carry handle anyways so just get something like picrel so you can get a red dot later. Good starter red dot like holosun or sig romeo for about 100-150. Red dots are more user friendly than irons and even the cheap ones are good enough to make it inexcusable to not have one. PSA runs good deals on full guns with red dots and magazines that I'd jump on if I were you. You need at least four magazines to be 'ready'.
>>

 No.1491

>>1489
Appreciate the advice, anon :]
>>

 No.1495

File: 1721738247765-0.png ( 94.69 KB , 474x346 , ClipboardImage.png )

File: 1721738247766-1.png ( 137.46 KB , 978x550 , ClipboardImage.png )

I want this bullpup conversion for the ruger 10/22. The original is one of the best 22 rifles on the market, and cutting the length down by almost a 3rd makes it a good option for a trail rifle.


File: 1721098480155.jpeg ( 93.97 KB , 800x450 , Spankbankpic#328.jpeg )

 No.1493[Reply]

I love John Lennon edition.
>>

 No.1494

>understanding the only communist rebellion in history as another local capital-liberating event


File: 1707011212671.jpg ( 174.38 KB , 1080x1337 , shell production.jpg )

 No.1436[Reply]

>From 1914 to 1918, Germany and Austria-Hungary produced up to 680 million shells and the industries of the Allies France, Britain, Russia (to October 1917), Italy, the U.S. and Canada, produced up to 790 million shells (the statistics vary greatly). The U.S. produced between 30 million and 50 million of these shells.

<[2023] - European Commissioner for the Internal Market Thierry Breton suggested that Europe could now make some 400,000 rounds annually. Estonia’s Pevkur, speaking at a November media roundtable, put the figure between 600,000 and 700,000—and said it would reach one million rounds in 2024.


So what happened? Were European countries in the early 20th century just built differently? Even France, who had much of its industrial regions occupied by the Germans, were producing 200,000 shells A DAY by the end of WWI. That's half of current European annual output in a single day.
Why are Europeans struggling to mass produce something as simple as the artillery shell, even though they managed it just fine 100+ years ago?
5 posts omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.1451

>>1448
this is largely correct. the idea behind a lot of neoliberal doctrine regarding this is the false bourgeois theory of "absolute and comparative advantage". It would support the idea that since the US handles shell production and steel, it would actually be negative to develop your own manufacturing. It is this same ideology driving globalists to keep Llatam an agrarian shithole. Read:
The Russian case
https://zenodo.org/records/4422709

General historical critique
https://critiqueofcrisistheory.wordpress.com/responses-to-readers-austrian-economics-versus-marxism/world-trade-and-the-false-theory-of-comparative-advantage/
>>

 No.1452

>>

 No.1453

>>1450
>just get shells from the US
Ukraine tried that, didn't go so well.

>>1451
I agree with this to an extend, but some parts of comparative advantage theory are not wrong. Like climate dependent crops for example.
>>

 No.1455

>>1436
That's because the West and NATO rely on air supremacy and not on heavy use of infantry and artillery. It's not a problem for the West. It's like complaining the West is not producing enough arrows.
>>

 No.1456

>>1455
>rely on air supremacy
That works until you pick a fight with an opponent that has competent air defenses

>It's like complaining the West is not producing enough arrows.

<implying artillery compares to bows and arrows
nothing survives an artillery barrage, so that comparison doesn't work.
20th century industrial warfare is crude by modern standards but you can't say that it's not effective.


Delete Post [ ]
[ overboard / sfw / alt / cytube] [ leftypol / b / WRK / hobby / tech / edu / ga / ent / music / 777 / posad / i / a / R9K / dead ] [ meta ]
Previous [ 1 / 2 ]
| Catalog | Home