>>11964I think the main problem is that there should be a clear delimitation between gnu/linux as a
tool (gentoo, nix, guix, etc.) and
gnu/linux as a consumer OS
I use gentoo as my daily driver because I like foss and programming (as a hobby) and portage is more or less what I would do if I decided to write a personal package manager. if I also wanted reproducibility, the end result would be very similar to guix. these package managers are just what a programmer would
expect, the
intuitive approach to the problem so to speak
I have no idea what people who want to use linux as a consumer OS to do office work or play windows games need, but I'm sure their requirements are not the same as mine. I don't want them to modify
my tools to accommodate for their needs, and the feeling is probably mutual
so that's my take I guess. I had to program on windows at work some years ago and it was terrible. the
one size fits most approach is a waste of time
>>12035>meson>unneccesarily convoluted build systemyou probably use shit like autotools and cmake already. meson is way less
convoluted than the alternatives