[ overboard / sfw / alt / cytube] [ leftypol / b / WRK / hobby / tech / edu / ga / ent / music / 777 / posad / i / a / R9K / dead ] [ meta ]

/dead/ - dead

Name
Email
Subject
Comment
Captcha
Tor Only

Flag
File
Embed
Password (For file deletion.)

Matrix   IRC Chat   Mumble   Telegram   Discord

| Catalog | Home

File: 1608528343548.png ( 164.77 KB , 459x499 , d0e.png )

 No.162[Reply]

If the universe is materialistic, why don't we feel at home here?
12 posts and 2 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.919

>>162
I kinda feel at home when Im in the mountains surrounded by wildlife. Its pretty calming
>>

 No.921

>>909
blame Steven Lynx for this regression in the boards code. Alternatively maybe Space_ fucked it up
>>

 No.1257

if nothing matters then why does it hurt?
>>

 No.1262

>>1257
things matter, but only subjectively and therefore not objectively. that's enough for every individual sjubject to be emotionally involved tho.
>>

 No.1367

>>169
it's from a Norwegian essayist, named Peter Wessel Zapffe


File: 1608528404479.jpg ( 124.91 KB , 1065x1006 , a.jpg )

 No.949[Reply]

pls help
31 posts and 1 image reply omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.1330

>>1327
i just willed myself into existence obviously.
first i didnt exist, than i was like: thats kinda lame, I wanna start existing!
and so, carbon and protein formations statred accumulating and the end product was me.
rad, isnt it?
>>

 No.1334

>>1330
>I wanna start existing!
said nobody ever
>>

 No.1336

>>1334
yeah looking back, it was a bad call, but now im stuck with it
>>

 No.1337

>>1258
>>1311
i have friends and we all do drugs
not like in a fun way, but yknow (stopping the memeing for a second…) legit i think people who do drugs to cope like you know they're struggling in some way, mentally or economically or something, and since its illegal (well.. some things, for some people… weed's legal here now :(), learning that someone else does it sort of breaks a layer of separation or alienation
>>

 No.1338

>>1337 (me)
by the way, i dont think using drugs to cope with things is cool or a good idea or anything really, like its bad for you long-term usually, if only because it can put people into a financial treading-water forever, but also i just mean with my joking for you to consider the idea of using chemicals to cope temporarily if it could help you


File: 1608528421635.jpg ( 171.76 KB , 736x883 , 963470d6ea60b49a482cb69d13….jpg )

 No.1207[Reply]

We are living in an age of turbulence. The paradigm of our existence is shifting, the society is standing on the brink of something that would drastically change or destroy the existing world order. Destabilization, polarization (political and otherwise) and intrinsic danger surround us at every step. Europe is the core of our existence, and multiculturalism caused by mass foreign invasion, with all its consequences, is the danger.

Throughout our lands, crime rates are rising rapidly, economy is suffering due to wrongly distributed welfare benefits, culture and ethnicity are being subverted and led into degeneracy with a clearly visible intent; and throughout our lands, backlash is evident and harsh. Riots among indigenous population, protest growing into true resistance against the criminal, anti-European, anti-White regimes.

We have waited and waited; for three generations we have waited. We have asked ourselves: What can we do? How can any change be possible when the proclaimed democracy is a lie? How can any change at all be possible when everything has been decided for us; when our nations are degraded, when our blood has no social/biological value anymore?

All traditional higher values of our society, of or past, our culture, our history, have been subverted and overturned. The tradition is no longer there. The value of having European descent is no longer there.

And we are in a race against time to avoid cultural replacement through a new Islamic invasion; and our hands are tied by the legislation, and our mouths are tied by tolerance and political correctness, and our people’s minds are clouded by the lies from the ruling elites and the media they govern.

So what CAN we do, what can we do right now, to avert a total catastrophe, to revert the process of annihilation enforced upon the Western culture, upon the White race?

The world is changing rapidly; the age is shifting. And what we CAN do is accelerate the backlash. What we CAN do is unite the youngest generations of Europe under on flag of White European resistance, traditionalism, ethnic nationalism; what we CAN do is bring about the true civil war by counter-acting the current invasion and its supporters at the top of our states: The EU. This backlash, this answer by actions to the danger we are facing is necessary and inevitable to sweep away the ethnically foreign elements and to restore monoculture.

Further polarization of sociePost too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>

 No.1216

you realize it takes a single click to search for any part of this text and see where you are copy-pasting it from?
>>

 No.1228

>>1216
your point?
>>

 No.1232

>the society is standing on the brink of something that would drastically change or destroy the existing world order.
this would be great if it were true, sadly it isn't. but you probably don't mean systemic change anyways but rather 'oh nooooes, black ppl in vidya make me cry ;_;'

>the society is standing on the brink of something that would drastically change or destroy the existing world order.

>this is your bain on /pol/
geez, no wonder all of you faggots shoot up schools. you live with self-inflicted paranoia.

>Europe is the core of our existence

kek

>and multiculturalism caused by mass foreign invasion, with all its consequences, is the danger.

How?

>Throughout our lands, crime rates are rising rapidly,

Again, would be cool. A rise in illegal activity might be enough to get rid of the legal framework os state authority. But the opposite is true mate.
Post too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>

 No.1235

>>

 No.1297

cringe


File: 1608528403809.png ( 109.19 KB , 643x492 , sexyanarchistastolfo.png )

 No.939[Reply]

I know that anarchy is just a state, it is not an ideology; it just means people solving their matters by themselves in an egalitarian manner(as seen by the community). The question is more about what the beginning would be like. I think it would go somewhat along these lines:

> A city of 100.000 people

> Affiliation groups of anarchists dethrone the local state power of their regions of operation
> Anarchists by some means(Public discourse, pamphlets) spread the news that the area was liberated
> In the means which they've chosen, they explain that people can organize their life as it fits them
> Lots of harsh debates will happen between people deciding on what to do
> People start contacting people around the city to organize what to do
> The situation with time will stabilize(not completely, because it cannot always exist because of individual needs) with time, because solutions to general problems of society will be met according to the people
> Many types of community could form from these, bourgeois without the state power to secure their private property, would in places where people wish to abolish it would be completely gone, while in other places if the community wishes to maintain it by their own will, it will remain.
> Some more communist communities, other extremely individualist because of some anarchist influences. It would be probably be a big mass of many different points of view, and probably conflict would hardly stabilize.
> Anarchy successful
1 post omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.945

A small cave in which 2-4 autists practise gay sex and browbeat each over thoughtcrimes.
>>

 No.956

massive fissioning and dispersal into smaller enclaves. We've been cooped up so much by capitalist production we want to get away. Production will decrease even further. Perhaps factories/ factory towns will see a revival as trade hubs. A general increase in 'real' economy and decrease in speculation and finance. Travelling nomad bands. Raids against suburban/petty-bourg hold-outs. If anthropology tells us anything the next social hurdle will be relations between the sexes and between a new mode of post-capitalist production and this social revolution, a cultural proliferation will occur. Renaissance in arts and sciences. It will be good.
>>

 No.967

>>

 No.1200

I think the question of what anarchy will look like, as in, what it'll be if it is finally realised, is a very traditional leftist question. It views anarchy as something not yet here, a heaven we reach after we overcame this world of plight.
To me, anarchy is the call to resist authority in the here and now. It's only participating in wage labor if it's in your benefit, not shying back before acts the state forbids and creating a living space according to your desires.
Obviously this isn't the abolishment of capitalism, some might even say it's life stylist, but if the option is joining a ml or syndicalist micro org and waiting for anarchy to start living my real life according to my desire, like a Christian waits for the afterlife, I know what I'll choose.
>>

 No.1237

>>939
>Some more communist communities, other extremely individualist because of some anarchist influences.
>implies communism can not be individualist


File: 1608528398208.png ( 95.48 KB , 217x301 , theoryfiction.png )

 No.858[Reply]

The Marxist analysis of Capitalism and post-Capitalism is fairly straightforward in its understanding of why Capitalism will not last.

The productive forces of Capitalism will be developed, until a certain point where Capitalism will come to inhibit their further growth. At this point, the proletariat must rise up and destroy the Capitalist mode of production to free the forces of production imprisoned within them.

What Marx does, is essentially agree with the "mission" of Capital, the growth of productive forces, but does not think Capitalism will be able to complete this mission due to its internal contradictions.

This is where the problem of Marxism comes in. Marx does not understand, as later thinkers who developed upon his ideas, Jaques Camatte and Nick Land, that the mission of Capital, the growth of productive forces, schizophrenic revolutionizing of society, etc, this is the problem humanity has with Capital, because these goals are on a fundamental level, anti-human. They are the goals of the market God, in its "progressive" quest to mechanize human life down to the second, not the goals of humanity. Post-Capitalism, or rather Capitalism that has broken through the wall of its own contradiction in order to further presue its mission, will not be for humans. It will be a continuation of the mission of Capital, and that missions end is the complete domestication and annihilation of the human race. Nick Land and Camatte made this very clear.

Marx attempts to divorce Capitalism and its technology, not realizing that Capitalism itself, the blind idiot god, is the most important part of this technology. No consciously organized system of humans can match the speed, versatility and growth of the dispersed dead brain of Capital itself.

The growth in productive forces do not exist for the benefit of humanity. They exist for the benefit of Capital. Capital itself is the motor of technological change and modernity. Nothing can replace it.

We do not want "Post-Capitalism". A post-Capitalism that contains the drive for progress of Capitalism will not be liberation. It will be the death of the human species and the planet earth. Industrial society, and Capital's mission of its expansion into all aspects of the human life and subjectivity, itself requires repression. We cannot progress "past" Capitalism, because progress is merely a measure of how completely Capital has subordinated the human community to itPost too long. Click here to view the full text.
41 posts and 1 image reply omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.905

>>877
why am I watching advertisements on the anticapitalist board
>>

 No.1238

>>858
all i hear is talk about Marx but nothing about communism inherently. Marxism is shit, who would have guessed, doesn't stop me from being communist
>>

 No.1239

File: 1608528423803.jpg ( 34.89 KB , 634x414 , IMG_20191123_020741.jpg )

>>858
>the goals of humanity
nice spook idiot. you might want to read deleuze himself instead of third-rate secondary lit like nick land.
>>

 No.1241

>>858
yes yes yes yes yes yes yes, humanfags rise up
>>

 No.1242

>>893
i think the proletariat is revolutionary in the same sense that the bourgeoisie was - that is, it only revolutionizes within the system and perfects it further, but does nothign to destroy the old god. The proletariat might triumph over the bourgeoisie, and we could get something much more egalitarian in a way, but it would still function to better serve the capitalist goal of full commodification and deconstruction of everything. What we call capitalism is just the modern incarnation of Capital. Its fundamentally democratic feudalism, which was a more democratic or anarchic version of empire. The project of Capital is the most basic formula - release more energy to itself and use that to grow, in order to release more energy. So i see a continuity between modern day capitalism and the oldest slaver city states


File: 1608528420902.jpeg ( 5.28 KB , 268x188 , normal.jpeg )

 No.1194[Reply]

Do any of you guys feel like you are just going through the motions of life because it's all you know how to do?
>>

 No.1195

I don't, but I guess that's more due to me not going through any motions at all. All I do is rott in my flat or buy groceries every 5 days.
>>

 No.1196

>>1195
I'm rotting too, this fucking sucks. My job has such a small amount of staff that at least I'm safe from the 'rona, but fuck this.
>>

 No.1197

>>1194
yeah basically, and honestly its the worst feeling there is for me, like just treading water. It instantly makes life meaningless when you're just living to live, but sometimes thats all ur circumstances allow for. Fucking sucks.
how i deal with it, friend: random acts of stupid willfulness basically. Get some hobby and make yourself work towards gitting good at it whenever you can. Get impaired at work. Get the supplies to camp/nomad and go on a lil trip. I think the only way to keep your soul is to remind yourself that the world hasnt totally broken you yet and give yourself "muscle memory" for things other than routine or what you're supposed to do. The thing that solidified my anarchism when i was younger was running away from home, but just because of how willful of an act it was. It reminded my soul that i still could choose for myself and change my own life


File: 1608528408457.jpg ( 424.12 KB , 1077x985 , 9762fed8f3e89c5e0da544b63e….jpg )

 No.1005[Reply]

I'm getting tired of these /pol/yps raiding our board, atleast here they won't find us.
How are you guys doing?
18 posts and 4 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.1055

>>1026
It's actually leftist instead of right-wingers cosplaying as revolutionaries.
>>

 No.1067

File: 1608528412659.gif ( 133.55 KB , 340x340 , smug anime girl 35.gif )

>>1055
>he thinks something being 'actually' leftist is an agrument for and not against it
>>

 No.1073

>>1067
I don't mind talking to social anarchists
>>

 No.1205

>>1306
>we need fascism
Sorry, not interested in a father-complex
>>

 No.1206

File: 1608528421545.jpg ( 19.43 KB , 476x268 , 6d2f2a39ce1bf5e36516c757cd….jpg )

>>1306


 No.18[Reply]

What's the hot new torture from post-late stage capitalism?
1 post omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.24

Being alive.
>>

 No.33

Sometimes, if I spend too much time around positivists, I get this creeping fear that they'll actually discover immortality.A life of perpetual fear and labor, without even the release of death–that is Hell–and there are people fantasizing about how they will make it happen. Apparently well-meaning people, who are all the more terrible and dangerous because of this psychotic break from reality that makes them believe things will get better under capitalism.Of course, there is also the obvious torture use of such a thing. Keep someone alive and imprisoned for centuries, until they go so crazy they start to believe that other people and the outside world were just products of their imagination.
>>

 No.35

File: 1608528326796.jpg ( 603.8 KB , 1600x1200 , 135638086061.jpg )

&gt&gt67"Life cannot simply be something to cling to. This thought skims through everyone at least once. We have a possibility that makes us freer than the gods: we can quit. This is an idea to be savoured to the end. Nothing and no one is obliging us to live. Not even death."
>>

 No.444

>>18test
>>

 No.1211

>>33
yeah but if there was a cosmetic that effectively stopped u from aging wouldnt you take it? like retinol x 1000


File: 1608528410261.jpg ( 49.29 KB , 600x600 , F A inf.jpg )

 No.1031[Reply]

I open up my wallet…
and it's full of blood…
>>

 No.1034

shouldnta used the money for ya cunny…
>>

 No.1187

I hear donating plasma is a big business in the USA.


File: 1608528406914.jpg ( 1.42 MB , 2214x2880 , image.jpg )

 No.984[Reply]

Mouffe and Laclau reject the centrality of the proletariat and the historical determinism in Marxism

-What do you think about it?
-Could you recommend me some "post-marxist" authors or books?
-Which have been the most recent developments in this "current"?
>>

 No.988

I think they have some points in their critique of Marx, but their "post-Marxism" is just liberalism with a new coat of paint. They cite Carl Schmitt a lot but ironically just end up recreating the bourgeois myth of parliamentary democracy that Schmitt critiqued so much.
>>

 No.1120

What the fuck is post-marxism?
>>

 No.1131

>>1120
probably also stuff like Catoriadis who was a marxist first and then have his theory a post-structuralist bend.
Maybe even Adorno and Arendt but they are already to far off marxism to be considered an inverse, or post-ideology form, of it.

>>984
>-What do you think about it?
To me this is a complicated issue. I like the critique of historical determinism and the role of the broad proletariat as the revolutionary subject. But I think most post-marxist are, strangely, deterministic and structuralist while describing these qualities to the complete body of Marx's and Engels theoretical output.

>-Could you recommend me some "post-marxist" authors or books?

https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/monsieur-dupont-nihilist-communism

>–Which have been the most recent developments in this "current"?

I really don't know but from outside I would say that the post-marxist 'scene' is probably quite small and the same is probably true for the disourse.


Delete Post [ ]
[ overboard / sfw / alt / cytube] [ leftypol / b / WRK / hobby / tech / edu / ga / ent / music / 777 / posad / i / a / R9K / dead ] [ meta ]
[ 1 / 2 / 3 / 4 / 5 / 6 / 7 / 8 / 9 / 10 / 11 / 12 / 13 / 14 / 15 / 16 / 17 / 18 / 19 / 20 / 21 ]
| Catalog | Home