/dead/ - dead

>>1032
join my shitty riot chat and talk about lockpicking with me
its time to be able to let yourself into wherever you want (results may vary)
#LMT:matrix.skeletoncrew.xyz

share more please

How useful is lockpicking really? Also somebody write a decent guide on carding please

>>1740
Been here for a while. I think you mean the Tor links?

http:// darkfailllnkf4vf.onion/ - Verified onion links, recommend setting this as your home page
http:// dreadytofatroptsdj6io7l3xptbet6onoyno2yv7jicoxknyazubrad.onion - Check the carding/fraud subdreads (/d/carding)
http:// torigonsn3d63cldhr76mkfdzo3tndnl2tftiek55i2vilscufer6ryd.onion/index.php - Hacking
http:// cryptbb2gezhohku.onion/ - Hacking
Sadly none of them are as big as Torum was
http:// rutorzzmfflzllk5.onion/ - For Russian speakers

>>1233
Do what I did anon

>>1838
http://hacktownpagdenbb.onion/Carding.html
cant remember if this guy is kinda retarded or pretty good
i think iirc i read some stupid jolly roger hacker or opsec text file thing that this site linked to and it was like… just bad. But thats a diff author so… i think this guy is cool if i remember right, but take it all with some salt

also to add to links, i love this place
http://darkzzx4avcsuofgfez5zq75cqc4mprjvfqywo45dfcaxrwqg6qrlfid.onion/

>>1041
Like the voice on zombo.com

Oh god why does this board still exist. I should have deleted it when I had the chance.

>>1123
lol

>>1123
Maybe this is where I can post and not get banned.

>>1203
I hope

D you people think that Donal J. Trump browses /dead/?

>>1797
THIS LIST OF THE TOP TEN THINGS YOU CAN SAY THAT WILL GET YOU ARRESTED WILL SURPRISE YOU!

>>1800
pussy

his daddy was a priest

somebody hurt his horse or something idk

>RIGHT IS MIGHT
h-hey you're my best friend right, could you please ask my waifu on a date for me?

>WE RECOGNIZE THAT CRUELTY IS THE BASIS OF EVERY HIGH ART
n-nooo not my horsey

>>1787
is this a joke?

>>1788
Democracy is an hierarchy

>>1795
>Post-left is leftists
>democratic party
this is just leftists, as opposed to libs
post-left is not leftist

>>797
>

>Comrade No. 876 [Reply] [Last]
I am a marxist that became nazbol after reading most of marxes works

>Do I fit in here? I am not just a nationalist tankie, I consider myself post left.
>37 posts and 10 images omitted.
>sAgE No. 1697

>Comrade No. 1912 >>1788
>>823
>Post-left is leftists who are ready to leave behind the democratic party plantation
Comrade No. 1913 >>1795
>>1787
Post too long. Click here to view the full text.

>>1803
is this a broken bot? why the fuck is the cia using our backwater for testing
gedoutahere

>>1731
This stinks of newfag.

>>1731
fam you don't know z0r whats wrong with you?
are you some kind of fucking ZOOMER?

>>1753
omg fuck this is memories
https://z0r.de/59

>>1754
i remember dying while watching https://z0r.de/229 on repeat like 10 years ago

these were simpler times

Sounds interesting

I might even try to write a small thing, but I also got a giant amount of uni stuff to do, so well see
thanks for sharing anyway op

I started reading Mutual Aid and damn, even birds have friends and shit, so why don't I??

>>1768
well bird are cute and can sing, how bout you?

>>1770
You're right I'm a worthless piece of shit

looks like it's just a website hosting a bunch of texts by these three people

also otto gross > wilhelm reich

>>1673
It's mostly this Laska's essays, but only a few are available in English:
http://www.lsr-projekt.de/poly/ennietzsche.html - Did Nietzsche know of Stirner?
http://www.lsr-projekt.de/poly/eninnuce.html - Why is everyone afraid of the big bad egoist?
http://www.lsr-projekt.de/poly/enmarsden.html - Was Dora Marsden an egoist?

The German has more essays, some that seem interesting, like Stirner as a teacher, Stirner and ancaps, there's even one about Otto Gross.

>>1672
Read some of their stuff on la Mettrie, and apparently it's a project with the goal of constituting a second enlightenment, or 'Enlightenment 2'.
Their premise is that although the enlightenment started as an european philosophical project in the 18th century and was developed through the 19th and the the first half of the 20th century, it was never completed due to not reaching it's goal (freeing the human from his self-sustained immaturity). But unlike the Frankfurt School, who thought the reason for this was the make-up of enlightenment theory itself, leading to it's own undoing (the relations created by the enlightenment were the grounds upon which it became impossible), LSR argues that enlightenment can be understood as going through different phases of development, with each phase seeing popular but wrong theorists overcoming one unpopular, but ultimately actually right theorist (18th century: Mettrie against Rouseau, 19th century: Stirner vs Marx, 20th century: Reich vs Freud).
According to LSR, studying Mettrie, Stirner and Reich and the controversies between them and their popular enemies will yield th philosophical grounds for a second enlightenment that actually fulfills it's mission.
How does that make any sense? I don't know yet but I'll keep reading some of that stuff since I got nothing better to do.

>>1689
Keep us posted fam

>>1773
Sure. I've read 5 of their articles on La Mettrie so far. They all were very similar in that all of the described the biography of Mettrie, talking about how he published 'the human machine', the book his is today most known for, very early in his philosophical career. The human machine is a very radical early materialist text, arguing that everything originates out of matter, including the psyché. Afterwards he had to flee several times from different countries, until he was invited to the philosophers court of Frederic II. LSR now argues that the works he has written here are his actually interesting material, because works like 'The art of lust' are different from other enlightenment philosophers of his time in that they were nihilistic instead of mormative.
I haven't read those books yet (they are currently already borrowed out at my local library) but from what the LSR author describes La Mettrie saw the main factor that was keeping people from truely enjoying themselves (specifically their lust) was their own conscience, which was forced into them by their sorroundings through the transmission of social norms. However La Mettrie apparently also differentiated between a healthy, satisfying desire and a desire that's also influenced by the conscience, only that the lust derived from this desire is not satisfying, because it only exists as the destruction of the conscience and is therefore still tied to it. From this point on La Mettrie was basically hated by the philosophers of his time, because they felt the whole moral nihilism thing was bad optics for the enlightenment, so he got cancelled.
I guess the parallels to Stirner are quite obvious, and I'm really interested to read the actual works by La Mettrie himself, so it might take my time to read the next texts of the website.
I also read 2 stirner articles,the one about nietzsche knowing stirner and 'Die Negation des irrationalen Über-Ichs bei Stirner', or 'Stirner's negation of the irrational super-ego', which tried to interpret Stirner as an 'anarchist' 'pedagogue'. The idea here is that Stirners concept of 'Der Eigner' or 'the owner/unique' could be used as the groundwork for an education that doesn't have the implementation of certain values and norms into a child as it's goal, but the support of the child in developing itself into a unique one. If there is interest, I can go deeper hPost too long. Click here to view the full text.

God is dead and no one cares.

I am no one, and therefore I care.

But if I am God, and God is ded, then by a simple logical syllogism that must mean that I am ded.

&gt&gt8If you let logic kill you, you are spooked.A=!A until you can't breath anymore.

almost diededededed

>>1757
>Why do you care if they are egoists or not?
because i like to hear non moralfag justifications for the way things are

>>1751
alternative: happiness is a choice an can be found anywhere, if youre willing to be a meditation slut

>>1758
I don't get it. But if you have read Stirner, he wrote about how most people tend to approximate the egoist but feel guilty about it afterwards, he called them "involuntary egoists".

>>1760
nice cope

>>1744
they are egoists in the same wane as everyboy is an egoist, but they are usually still spooked.
owning capital comes with its own norms you have to adhere to to be talking seriously by others capitalists or that are simply the result of how accumulation works. Just because they are benefiting from class domination doesnt mean they are not integrated in the class structure and thus tend to live not as unique egos, but as capitalists and liberals.