>>9889>The west literally funded the talibanThats kinda my fuckin point anon.
The west funded the taliban, and people have argued they funded the NSDAP to.
However the west was litterally responsible for sending lennin to russia and armed the communists in china before and after WWII.
Unlike the Communists however???
The West went to war with the Taliban and Hitler
But DID NOT go to war with the USSR or Communist China.
Demonstrating my point of them perfering you to /us/ as a broader part of my argument that the left is ultimately the puppet of international finance.
>>9890No but we are arguing that islamic theocrats have gotten far more violence brought down on them then communists have for decades now.
Communists even being allowed into the halls of power as the west exports all its manufacturing over to them and works along side them in the UN as a coalition partner
>>9891Will do
>>9892>also consider that US-China relations are in a nosedive Probably the best counter argument to be made.
However i think this is ultimately for the purpose of collapsing the US into civil war so China can become the new dominant kosher super power as it will have far less internal opposition to World Government then the US with its problematic opportunities for discent allow.
(As seen with the rise of Nationalism and Liberterianism on the right and before that the anti-war movement on the left)