>>485812>conflating democrats/liberals and "the left">clinging to one faulty democrat data point to push your anti trans slopYou're such a piece of shit. Nothing you've said is materialist or data driven. You're just a fucking transhumanist obsessed retard.
>everyone hates insufferable "leftists"Your "data" doesn't say this at all. All your data says is that "kamala focused too much on cultural issues" was a more persuasive argument than whatever it was paired up against.
https://blueprint2024.com/polling/why-trump-reasons-11-8/As a whole the takeaway is that the Democrats didn't actually provide the voters with an economic reason to vote for them, which is true. Internally the Biden administration was convinced that the economy is doing fine. Kamala really didn't offer any real concrete economic policies
Beyond that though it's clear you don't understand what Democrat policy towards trans people actually is, what purpose it serves, and why they're now trying to abandon it.
The Democrats and Republicans both use trans people and trans rights in the same way. They're a useful political smokescreen and that's basically it. For the Democrats it provides a veneer of progressivism to their neoliberal policies and for the Republicans it obfuscates their policies of class warfare. By being so unhinged about trans people you've revealed yourself to be a dupe taken in by their ploy, so great job.
The Democrats only provide lip service to trans rights and don't spend any significant amount of time or political capital advocating for them. You're retarded for thinking otherwise. Whenever they "do" have to advocate for trans people it's to the same end that they do for any other social issue, which is as a means to avoid talking about the real issue.
And that's really the same thing you're doing, focusing on trans shit instead of the real class issues at work here. For the voting population, they got demonstrably poorer between 2020 and 2024. The Democrats let popular policies like the enhanced child tax credit, covid era medicaid expansion, and enhanced unemployment insurance lapse. Prices are going up and wages aren't, and the Democrats ran a campaign like everything is fine.
As for the Democratic party itself, it's been at odds with its progressive wing for decades. Every election they blame their "underperformance" on the left of the party and shift further right. This shift has been accelerated by Trump as Republican politicians have fled the Republican party and joined with the Democrats, most prominently in this election being the Cheneys.
The Democrats are in a hard spot because they're in an electoral dead end. They can't offer working people real material gains because they'd never actually deliver on them since that conflicts with the interests of their donors. The pmc is already their voting base, the donor class is too small to matter electorally, and they can't meaningfully contest working class Republicans for a number of reasons. The only "viable" voting population they can try to compete for at this point is the "swing" voters that voted for Trump. Aka, the fascist petite bourgeoisie.
https://www.liberalpatriot.com/p/throw-the-groups-under-the-busRuy calls them the "working class" but every one of his examples is a small business owner that is practically slavering at the idea of punishing homeless people and immigrants for impacting their precious businesses.
That's the root of the "trans issues cost us the election" shit. The Democrats want the fascist vote. The "data" you're citing has been crafted to support the same reactionary "we need to abandon minorities to appeal to the real working class" shit that's been percolating for the past decade. You weren't banned from the other board because of a transhumanist conspiracy to oppress your brave "materialist" take. You're just a garden variety reactionary that's been saying the same reactionary shit that's been polluting leftypol for years now.