>>475280I must say, your assertion that every attempt at communism inevitably results in a technocratic oligarchy is a rather simplistic and misguided viewpoint. It reeks of a shallow understanding of both history and political ideologies. The claim that communism inherently leads to technocratic oligarchies is a gross oversimplification that conveniently ignores the nuances of various socialist and communist movements throughout history.
recognize that not all socialist or communist systems have followed the same trajectory. Different countries and movements have implemented their versions of communism with varying degrees of success and failure. To blanketly state that every attempt at communism leads to technocratic oligarchy demonstrates a lack of appreciation for the diversity of approaches and outcomes.
the assertion that the West is already a technocratic oligarchy is a simplistic reduction of complex political systems. Western democracies, while certainly facing their own challenges and imperfections, are fundamentally different from the totalitarian regimes that you seem to equate with communism. The very essence of democracy is the involvement of the people in decision-making, which is a stark contrast to the autocratic tendencies often associated with technocratic oligarchies.
Your assertion that a technocratic oligarchy is inevitable irrespective of cultural and social characteristics lacks nuance and fails to account for the countless variables that shape political systems. Political outcomes are influenced by a multitude of factors, including the legal framework, historical context, the degree of citizen participation, and the balance of power among various institutions.
Labeling those who disagree with your perspective as "lovable derpy autists" is not only disrespectful but also reflects a regrettable inability to engage in a mature and constructive debate. It's crucial to foster respectful discourse when discussing complex political and economic ideologies.
Lastly, comparing "space communism" to a functional military, while making dismissive remarks about the American military, is an oversimplification that ignores the critical distinctions between military institutions and socio-economic systems. The purpose and structure of a military organization are inherently different from those of an economic system, and it's intellectually dishonest to equate the two.
your assertion that communism inexorably leads to technocratic oligarchies lacks depth, ignores historical nuances, oversimplifies complex political systems, and demonstrates a disdainful attitude towards those who hold differing viewpoints. It's essential to engage in thoughtful and respectful discussions when tackling intricate topics like political ideologies.