>>6282What kinda experience do you want from philosophy? It really depends on what you're looking for. If you want to feel like you can know nothing and want to feel the powerlessness, try David Hume's Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding. If you want an introduction to the methods of living "the good life", Epicureanism and Stoicism. If you wanna be a Marxist and get the hang of dialectics, start with some of Plato's dialogues like Euthyphro and
pay attention to how the initial claim of Socrates' partner is forced into a corner or developed through introspection. If you really dunno just stick with Plato and try whatever, like Gorgias. Every good intro book to philosophy is meant for you to read the primary text at some point. The goal of philosophy is to get you to think for yourself and develop your sense of reason, so no book can summarize the lessons for you, unless you're just trying to do a history of philosophy.
Believe it or not, the first part of that /pol/ infographic isn't a bad start
>>6290 but it clearly was made by someone who either thought it was a good idea to recommend Critique of Pure Reason and Practical Reason by themselves without proper context, and just dump the Phenomenology there. Kant and Hegel is goatse for the mind, and you need prep–for Kant I recommend Groundwork/Grounding/Foundations on the Metaphysics of Morals and What is Enlightenment to get a sense of his broader project before you get screwed. Good luck with Hegel.