>>11878not saying users here are obsessed with .org just that its identity is tied to it, most users here are or were .org users at some point
when i talk about the identity of the site i mean in the context of the historical material causes of its origin and userbase. supposing that it suddenly gets a huge influx of regular users unrelated to .org in any way, it will change the sites identity. so the identity has to evolve either way
furthermore there are structural and societal constraints on the sites userbase potential, see
>>11839