>>487129>Except a lot of what they lied about was stuff like saying "masks aren't effective!" early on, over-stating the efficacy of vaccines in preventing the illness, downplaying the contagiousness at the start of the pandemic, and then downplaying the death rate as they ended shutdownsGovernments can lie about things like a secret weapons program because that is stuff that doesn't directly touch the lives of their citizens, and it usually won't have any consequences. But they can't lie about things that touch the lives of their citizens without burning the institutional trust that enables them to have authority.
By the way the biggest lie related to covid was the omission that it had been predicted many years in advance, in exceptional detail, down to problems like hospitals lacking ventilator equipment. Given that foreknowledge we could have implemented decent public healthcare policies, and covid would have been a "nothing burger" that hardly killed anybody and only severely harmed very few. A decision was made to ignore the warning and let millions die.
If it had swung the other way and governments had implemented good public health care policy based on the scientific projection. Good governance of this type would have increased public trust by a lot.
>If someone lies to me about what kind of plane is in the sky, and I see the plane there and it's different from the kind of plane they say it is, at no point is it rational for me to then conclude that planes don't exist and aviation is fake.You need a electron microscope to see a virus. I too looked at the scientific publications with the covid e-scope pics and yeah if you understand how to look at those it does make the virus as real as seeing a plane in the sky. But many people aren't plugged into the scientific sphere. To them it's not a objective measurement, to them it's a story where somebody claims to have seen a strange flying machine.
>I had COVID, most people I know had COVID, some people I knew were hospitalized for complications of COVID, at least one friend's grandparent was killed by COVID, and tons of people died of it. Unless you were living under a rock at the time and didn't know anybody or catch it, it would be completely insane to come to the conclusion that it didn't exist.When you get down to it, this really is a question about causes. The high injury rate and death-tole was caused by a lack of hospital capacity, not enough medical staff and not enough equipment. Especially that last part. Technically we could stockpile large numbers of hazardous environment suits, and then hand them out when a plague breaks out. That would end all pandemics forever. With that in mind was it really the virus that killed or injured sooo many people ?
> It's not critical thinking, it's some sort of weird mindless pure reaction where someone somehow got accidentally reverse psychology'd into disregarding their own eyes, medicine, and all evidence just because the US gov't lied about some stuff, even though some of the gov'ts deception was downplaying how bad the very same disease was.You are making a lot of assumptions.
I get it that you are frustrated by all the insane nonsense that is being said, but if you zoom out, it's not necessarily irrational. Bad policy decisions were made, that caused a lot of preventable death and suffering, and the general public lost trust as a result. Many people indirectly express distrust by simply contradicting or inverting what officials are saying, rather than stating the distrust directly. That likely is a cultural idiosyncrasy more than anything. If people say something with the intent to express distrust, it is completely pointless to lecture them on facts.
Maybe try this translation matrix:
<Covid isn't realmeans
<Heads up, government officials are lying about stuff, you can't trust their advice.What is being negotiated here is not a medical reality, but a political reality.
The root problem for all of this is the-powers-that-be trying to bend scientific truths to fit their agenda. We will continue on the retarded time-line until such times this gets frustrated comprehensibly. It is the way of the enlightenment that power capitulates to scientific discovery. The people with power need to have their heads corrected first, this problem originates from the top.
I also think we should use a different metaphor. It makes more sense to treat viruses like a "fog pokemon" that drains "life-force" from the hosts it infects.