ests past partners affect future offspring, even with a different father. (4th century BCE)< Historically accepted but later debunked: Early 20th century (1900s)< Involves traits of past partners impacting genetic makeup< Once used to discourage mati

Posting mode: Reply [Return]
Name
EmailjNED7.0xh-5/V\+cT⛭<gkf(
Subject	Spoiler Image
Comment
Captcha Tor Only
Flag
File
Embed
Password	(For file deletion.)

Name

Subject

Spoiler Image

Comment

Captcha
Tor Only

Flag

File

Embed

Password

(For file deletion.)

Anonymous 2024-08-03 (Sat) 10:12:13 No.507

ests past partners affect future offspring, even with a different father. (4th century BCE)
< Historically accepted but later debunked: Early 20th century (1900s)
< Involves traits of past partners impacting genetic makeup
< Once used to discourage mating across social classes or races: Throughout history, notably during periods of rigid social stratification
< Debated concept with limited scientific backing
< Implies traits can be inherited from non-biological parents
< Raises questions about the nature of genetic inh