>>11886"Distrust of government" is not indicative of potential for a socialist revolution, really. There's ample historic evidence for this.
>you just have to channel all of thisYou and what army? Historically, all successful revolutions operated with multiple or a singular but strong communist parties. As far as I can tell "left-leaning" (lol) parties in the USA are either a complete joke/psyop (DSA, CPUSA) or "heroic" but ineffective (PSL). (If you are an anarchist I won't even discuss this point with you further.)
>the US empire MUST fall at the hands of a socialistic revolution for the global proletariat to be freeThe US empire WILL fall, but not "at the hands of a socialistic revolution". We are not in contention regarding the point that your parasitic state must fall for the global proletariat to be free.
Anyway, I would recommend you to educate yourself about the historical record of "fall of empires". You can not name a
single example when an empire fell and its collapse immediately led to a higher stage of societal/economic organization for its core citizens. What you are implying here goes contrary to the historical record and needs (at the very least) some proper theoretical underpinnings to be taken seriously (beyond "ppl dislike the gov", lmao).
As for your post, especially with that pic: LARP