Military Doctrine: EBO, SOD

Posting mode: Reply [Return]
Name
Email⛅3t1mgwl`chbn2r♖=BOvp6;]!☣P@q&♨YK{}(V⛮k0⚙iD_⚗Q+⛭$SIJ4E%a8 \|G9xCL~j<WRdeMo/5,- [?7fsN	⛏g5Z$B#dpC2]DyL'b,awTjM*!u.VX (vI⛍\`H3♜9J7W64⚘i★♶-olz0@/=☝[:&NS1Fh>GnOrfUYP⚈m⛆_\|s{cx%~AK}etRE8q^+k<;
Subject	Spoiler Image
Comment
Captcha Tor Only
Flag
File
Embed
Password	(For file deletion.)

Military Doctrine: EBO, SOD Anonymous 2021-01-07 (Thu) 21:27:11 No.4802

Hello all. I just finished reading a report about the Israel/Lebanon war called "We Were Caught Unprepared" and I was interested in learning more about Effects-Based Operations and Systemic Operational Design which were used by Israel and written or spread by S. Naveh. It sounds like pomo warfare but I want to know if it's legit or not. I'm trying to find more info about it and the document mentioned here in the report:

>Of the 170 pages long doctrine document, many experienced officers didn’t understand more than half. Officers responsible for planning EBOs in the Air Force, could not understand the definition of EBO (more precisely in Hebrew Effect-Based Campaigns) or of the definition of the word “Campaign” in the document. The terminology used was too complicated, vain, and could not be understood by the thousands of officers that needed to carry it out. . . . The new terminology and methodology was supposed to be limited to the higher levels of command, and at the level of theater command and definitely at the division level, the old terminology and methodology should have been used.

I've found several papers on EBO but nothing penned by Naveh (I'm attaching them). ITT we can also academically discuss military doctrines. I'm more versed in philosophy than military doctrine but I'm open to learning about campaigns or strategies.