Marx's "Capital" And One Free World

Posting mode: Reply [Return]
Name
Email
Subject	Spoiler Image
Comment
Captcha Tor Only
Flag
File
Embed
Password	(For file deletion.)

File: 1608528390176.jpg ( 39.54 KB , 306x472 , 1606178934137.jpg )

Marx's "Capital" And One Free World Comrade 2020-12-21 (Mon) 05:26:30 No.4415

Has anyone read it? What do you think of its attempt at refuting marxism, its socioeconomic analysis, and Hegelian logic?

Comrade 2020-12-21 (Mon) 05:26:30 No.4416

Gib .pdf plz

Comrade 2020-12-21 (Mon) 05:26:30 No.4417

>>4416
https://libgen.rs/book/index.php?md5=797862C28E5145A0367B3D5D17C6A421

Comrade 2020-12-21 (Mon) 05:26:30 No.4418

>>4417
Ty but my phone won't let me load that link

Did you know you can upload .pdfs here?

Or is it a huuuge file and that's why my phone no like?

Comrade 2020-12-21 (Mon) 05:26:30 No.4419

File: 1608528390524.pdf ( 22.1 MB , Tadao Horie (auth.) - Marx….pdf )

Not OP. It's 23 MB.

Comrade 2020-12-21 (Mon) 05:26:30 No.4426

Former Marxists make the worst Enemies imo

Comrade 2020-12-21 (Mon) 05:26:31 No.4427

>>4426
Why the worst? Shouldn't they be the best enemies because they have the most ammo and a better understanding than your average reactionary?

Comrade 2020-12-21 (Mon) 05:26:31 No.4428

>>4427
Yeah because they have an understanding, they make the worst enemies. It'll be much harder to convince them again

Comrade 2020-12-21 (Mon) 05:26:31 No.4429

>>4428
Nah if they ever did understand the material they wouldn't be former Marxists

At least hopefully they'll have some superficial understanding of theory which makes things easier

Comrade 2020-12-21 (Mon) 05:26:31 No.4430

>>4429
>Nah if they ever did understand the material they wouldn't be former Marxists
No one can ever have an intellectually honest disagreement with Marx? C'mon man I'm a Marxist and this is religious tier thinking.

Comrade 2020-12-21 (Mon) 05:26:31 No.4432

Does anyone have a critique of the Book?

Comrade 2020-12-21 (Mon) 05:26:31 No.4434

>>4430
Not without being Marxist in the same way that one cannot have an intellectually honest disagreement over the fact that objects tend to fall down within a gravity well absent countervailing force

Well that is unless one misunderstands the material

Comrade 2020-12-21 (Mon) 05:26:31 No.4436

>>4415
Bunkerchan is super slow for me. I'll hopefully look into it soon. I'm of the thought that materialist hegelianism is the peak of human thought. I don't think it can be refuted, only transcended. Maybe the way he build his arguments is bunk, but the conclusions seem very sound.

Comrade 2020-12-21 (Mon) 05:26:31 No.4437

>>4436
I can only guess because I just started the Book, but I think he will argue that, because Hegelian Dialectics can't be refuted, it is dangerous. It serves as a way to justify every Despotical System etc. Completely Bollocks in my Mind, but he is probably an Analytic Faggot

Comrade 2020-12-21 (Mon) 05:26:31 No.4439

The Cover looks Badass ngl

Comrade 2020-12-21 (Mon) 05:26:34 No.4472

>>4434
stop embarrassing yourself

Comrade 2020-12-21 (Mon) 05:26:53 No.4725

>>4415
Bump

Comrade 2020-12-21 (Mon) 05:26:53 No.4727

>>4472
he was spot on though

Comrade 2020-12-21 (Mon) 05:26:53 No.4728

>>4434
lmfao

Unique IPs: 1