>>6451The point was was the liberals maintained homosexuality is an inalienable trait and any suggestion otherwise was the epitome of bigotry.
Yes will still flippantly suggest incels fuck each other.
Even though there have been many cases of homosexuals becoming straight, there being a spectrum of homosexuality (so many people aren't really that "gay" so to speak), and social contagion (people can believe they're gay because it's widely propagandized).
The point was to highlight the staggering hypocrisy of liberals regarding incels. How suggesting homosexuals can become straight is an unforgivable sin while antagonizing incels about their heterosexuality is okay even though it undermines their beliefs about both orientations.
>they also find a trend for heterosexuals with a non-heterosexual twin to have more opposite-sex partners than do heterosexual twin pairs.>These results suggest that genes predisposing to homosexuality confer a mating advantage in heterosexuals, which helps explain the evolution and maintenance of homosexuality in the population.This makes no sense to me. How would a hetro having more sex when their other twin is homo confer any evolutionary advantage.
This could also easily be explained through socialization. Homosex men tend to easily build trusting relationships with women because their orientation puts no demands on women while still giving women a short of penis whisperer to befriend (This absence of sexual pressure is also why effinate "Boy Bands" are so popular with young hetro girls, they're seuxally attracted to the opposite sex but lack the maturity to cope with the demands of a real heterosexual male.)
This home twin could simply accelerate the socialization of the hetro twin by sharing his experiences with women, and maybe even use his trusting bonds to match make his twin.