[ overboard / sfw / alt / cytube] [ leftypol / b / WRK / hobby / tech / edu / ga / ent / music / 777 / posad / i / a / R9K / dead ] [ meta ]

/R9K/ - Robot - 9000

Name
Email
Subject
Comment
Captcha
Tor Only
Flag
File
Embed
Password (For file deletion.)
Matrix   IRC Chat   Mumble
ReturnCatalogBottom

File: 1712816269074.jpg ( 126.79 KB , 612x608 , paperboy-with-news.jpg )

 No.5577[View All]

First Incel News General archived here:
https://archive.is/wip/TqRsc
256 posts and 105 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.7804

>>7799
>rich brat passes driving test 1 year ago
>drives a 800bhp vehicle
>crashes and dies
Who could have seen that coming.

>>7800
Did she forget to spray tan her feet lol
>>

 No.7806

>>7804
Tbh American roads can be tricky
>>

 No.7807

>>7798
This is why I hate getting head.
Most guys aren't attractive enough to me to allow their mouth h anywhere near my dick or face.
>>

 No.7808

>>7807
You do know you can get head from women too…
>>

 No.7809

>>7808
Maybe they prefer men.
>>

 No.7810

>>7808
>>7809
Women wanna charge an army and leg for a slightest bit of skin
>>

 No.7812

File: 1733622343761.jpg ( 165.87 KB , 1022x1363 , 20241207_184510.jpg )

>>

 No.7846

PornHub na dotherporn sites sre gonna imolement ID verification tonwatch porn. Thats gonna suck.
Its amazing that people will ban porn to protect he younguns but not ban bullies/delinquents.
>>

 No.7849

>>7846
Porn is terrible but I don't think it should be outright banned.
>>

 No.7852

>>789
This. Especially for teens. Would you rather they get wrongfully accused of sexual predation for hitting on the opposite sex at school?

IDC what anyone says, porn is better for teens than dating nowadays.

Having to deal with potential webcam whores that wanna charge you an arm and a leg for a kiss?
>>

 No.7945

File: 1737168416510-0.png ( 197.74 KB , 1170x893 , 5e2c030c-56bc-4ee8-8b2c-5b….png )

File: 1737168416510-1.png ( 106.31 KB , 1170x589 , a593e986-46a1-49fe-9ae2-f2….png )

Men should have always had an equal say when it came to abortion. But the screaming feminist harpies had to have the woman hold all the power.
Now after generations of being held at the whims of their partners men are exacting their revenge.
I predict you will see hordes of men take advantage of this.
>>

 No.7946

>>7945
>Men should have always had an equal say when it came to abortion.
Nah.
>>

 No.7947

>>7946
Well they do now.
>>

 No.7949

File: 1737174480550.png ( 324.79 KB , 1290x1892 , 92e0734b-96b7-4a7d-8292-4b….png )

CHUDs in shambles
>>

 No.7951

>>7949
Never seen a more heinous example of a criminal trying to whitewash their misdeeds with idpol.
>>

 No.7952

File: 1737258130053.png ( 504.64 KB , 864x1920 , Screenshot_20250118-204056.png )

Hoes on suicide watch
>>

 No.7953

>>7952
>>

 No.7955

>>7952
Tik Tok is back
>>

 No.7961

File: 1737557782773.jpg ( 748.51 KB , 1170x1305 , 1737556043943594.jpg )

>>

 No.7963

>>7962
lmao
>>

 No.7971

File: 1739563408053.jpg ( 246.66 KB , 864x1206 , IMG_20250214_130139.jpg )

Is China /leftcel/?
https://youtu.be/OY5ZD6k4sMk?si=j2kC_XpWaXanYMFD
>>

 No.7972

>>7971
It goes to show that third worldism is a farce.
Americans may be flawed but so is the Orient.
>>

 No.7974

>>7972
>flawed
Do you mean based?
And I don't know what's so bad with this type of equity sharing. It's literally how any property division works why is it different when you're sleeping together.
Feminists are trying to pretend like this is still the Victorian era, when women couldn't work or own property. But every modern women works now and don't stop when they have a kid. So they're not "sacrificing" anything.
If they want claims on martial property they're going to have to pay into it.
This will dramatically change dating in China and it will be more equitable. There won't be this loneliness epidemic like there is in the states. Since there won't be any way for women to use their pussy to raise their socioeconomic status so they won't throw themselves at Chad until they're in their 30's after it's too late to find someone.
>>

 No.7975

>>7974
No. What I mean is that all the problems caused by female hypocrisy in the West are also present in the east.

Also:
>There won't be this loneliness epidemic like there is in the states. Since there won't be any way for women to use their pussy to raise their socioeconomic status so they won't throw themselves at Chad until they're in their 30's after it's too late to find someone.

You sweet summer child.
You really think that anti-gynocentric laws will stop women from "leveling" the playing field?
>>

 No.7976

>>7974
>This will dramatically change dating in China and it will be more equitable.

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

Anon thinks China will not suffer backlash from roasties for this
>>

 No.7977

>>7975
Yes, modern women completely rely on the state to exploit men for them. If the state says the party's over, it is.
>>

 No.7978

File: 1739674067846.jpg ( 80.62 KB , 864x522 , IMG_20250215_194342.jpg )

Publicly funded gold diggers?
>>

 No.8037

File: 1741285318260.gif ( 534.16 KB , 250x144 , 1740726180045185.gif )

DOGE targets child support database full of income data

https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2025/03/06/doge-hhs-ssa-data/

It's speculated that they're trying to find women that are getting enough child support to have their benefits cut or women that are evading taxes.

It's an ugly secret about American life that millions of single moms intentionally had children out of wedlock to get welfare benefits and to avoid having to work.

If DOGE really does prove millions of women either aren't entitled to benefits or owe back taxes it completely destroys material incentives to being a single mother.

This will force women to marry men instead of relying on welfare for economic stability which will force women to date and marry men that will realistically wed them, i.e. their looks match.

If that happens the loneliness epidemic for men ends. We might be witnessing the end of incels as we know them.
>>

 No.8038

>>8037
And LeftyPol is considered delusional.
No, it won't stop "male loneliness".
Those women will be one even more draconian.
And not all single moms are welfare queens let alone get much for it
>>

 No.8039

>>8038
Bro, almost every Boomer was married by their early 20's despite being the most backwards generation ever. It's was primarily due to the lack of the modern welfare state which doesn't start until Lyndon B Johnson's great society.

Yeah, most women on welfare don't live great but they don't have to work either. Like an actual career, not just menial jobs they work to make a few extra bucks like waiting tables.
It was radically alter the dating landscape.
>>

 No.8040

>>8039
>It's was primarily due to the lack of the modern welfare state
Scrapped in the '90s, yet people still trot out these idiotic pre-Clinton cliches about welfare mothers. It's not an "ugly secret," it's a neoliberal talking point from the 1970s which people kept repeating as a zombie mantra even after the neolibs had gotten total control and chipped away at it, just like some people still blame their problems on the unions which have been decimated since Reagan.
>>

 No.8041

>>8039
There was a welfare state back in the old days as well. And in fact, women back then were just married off to men to compensate for their existence.
Those women probably got around a lot more than you think.
It was also legal to smoke and drink while pregnant back in those days.
Abortions were more common back then too. It just wasn't openly encouraged.

Also, most boomers got married early twenties the latest.
Most didn't even marry officially.

The real problem is that we took away blue collar classes from schools and encouraged stranger danger
>>

 No.8042

>>8040
It was not "scraped" but yes it faced deep cuts but even now we're no where near what it was like pre Great Society.

You clearly never actually deal with anyone on welfare. Section 8 alone houses millions of families that would otherwise be out on the street and these stipends can be several thousands of dollars a month depending on how many children you have and where you live.
NOTHING like that existed before the 1960's
>>

 No.8043

>>8041
You are an absolute dunce if you think abortions were more common before Roe v Wade.
And now women were not more promiscuous before the pill.
>>

 No.8044

>>8043
>Naive moralist hasn't heard of backdoor abortions

>Doesn't know about how common it was for men to skip town to meet their favorite mistress and have bastards by them.

>Confuses cybersex money for physical sex
>>

 No.8045

>>8044
You are an absolute dunce if you think something as underground as back alley abortions were anywhere near as prevalent as abortions administered by institutional doctors in hospitals and clinics that were present in every medium sized town.
>>

 No.8046

File: 1741468417396.png ( 130.45 KB , 1161x934 , d2015083-9dae-4594-b4bc-3b….png )

The era of incels is ending, the era of femcels is just beginning.
>>

 No.8047

>>8044
Do you know what happens to women that have sex without birth control?
No there wasn't that many men skipping town and sleeping with a mistress as evidenced by the fact that there were barely any never married single mothers back then.
Back then the only women that slept around were the ones that were barren.
>>

 No.8048

>>8045
I'm starting to understand how women manage to pull fast ones on men

You do know that back in the old days, we had midwives?
And fathers would pressure it.

>>8047
Birth control existed long before pills. There were herbal remedies to take care of "happy little accidents".

It never ceases to amaze me how naive that reactionaries are
>>

 No.8049

>>8046
Disillusioned single moms are not femcels.
Sexless cat moms/wine aunts are closer to femcels.
>>

 No.8050

>>8048
>You do know that back in the old days, we had midwives?
And fathers would pressure it.
Dafaq does that have to do with the number of single moms?
It's demonstrably true that we have far more single moms now then we did in the past. And women got married while still in high school.
Women couldn't sleep around because it was nearly impossible to do. Sure some women did it anyway, but I'm talking triple digit body counts like women have today, not the one or two men they might have slept with whole cheating on their husbands.
Yes obviously there was infidelity but nowhere to the degree we have now. There was no fucking internet or smart phones. You could only sleep with men in your own neighborhood and people gossiped more.
>Birth control existed long before pills. There were herbal remedies to take care of "happy little accidents".
Haha, now I know you're an incel. None of that shit works dipshit, you need pharmaceutical grade drugs to reliably induce an abortion. You're not going to get that from distilling weeds.
>>

 No.8051

>>8050
Bruh, you call me an incel and conjure up made up statistics about women having triple body count nowadays?
>>

 No.8052

>>8050
>None of that shit works dipshit, you need pharmaceutical grade drugs to reliably induce an abortion. You're not going to get that from distilling weeds.

Most pharmaceutical drugs came from the weeds
>>

 No.8053

>>8052
>the Chinese traditional medicine industry has entered the chat.
>>

 No.8054

>>8050
>Women couldn't sleep around because it was nearly impossible to do. Sure some women did it anyway, but I'm talking triple digit body counts like women have today, not the one or two men they might have slept with whole cheating on their husbands.
Yes obviously there was infidelity but nowhere to the degree we have now. There was no fucking internet or smart phones. You could only sleep with men in your own neighborhood and people gossiped more.

Are you aware that people skipped town?
Are you also aware that body count can be balanced out by amount of sex had with a select few partners

Are you also aware that soliciting of female minors was more common in the past?
And that said female youth weren't as innocent as you think they were?
>>

 No.8055

File: 1741712008402.jpg ( 53.99 KB , 1024x768 , total-divorce-rate-divorce….jpg )

>>8054
Socialism is also a big part of the problem.

The state taxes working men and then gives the money to unemployed women. That lets them fuck around and have babies without serious commitment until they hit the wall and then get cats and die alone.

In the old days unmarried women were a burden on their families instead of the state. So the incentive was to find a man and marry early instead of living off welfare forever.
>>

 No.8056

>>8055
All socioeconomic systems burden men with burden of higher taxation.
Also, irony is, socialism wouldn't allow e-whores to run amok like they do in capitalism.
>>

 No.8057

>>8055
>Socialism is also a big part of the problem.
North Korea is the only country on the earth with no taxes.
>>

 No.8092

New tax on singles being Enforced in Japan

Unique IPs: 35
[Return][Catalog][Top][Home][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ overboard / sfw / alt / cytube] [ leftypol / b / WRK / hobby / tech / edu / ga / ent / music / 777 / posad / i / a / R9K / dead ] [ meta ]
ReturnCatalogTopBottomHome