>>5231>Having jobs at all is abuse, brah. Fully automated luxury gay space communism now.Wrong. Compulsory schooling is abuse.
Also how do you think fully automatic spaceship luxiry communism will come about?
>Of course this lack of ability to give consent only applies if her partner is a productive man with a programming job, but if it's a useless teen Chad faggot whose only "contribution" to society for his entire life will be a shitty rap album on SoundCloud then it's just fine.Thats kinda hebeandrophobic.
Also alot of those adult males perving on teen girls arent that much better in prospects.
Again, why should men be required to prive the.selves as proper mtes but women dont have to?
Also, the rest of your post shows hebegynophilia.
I dont have any moral peeves about i but it pisses me off tgat female youths are showered in attention and synpathy while male youths are pathologised.
Also, statutory rape also applies to male youths as well.
Men go to jail for sleeping with teenage boys but its not talked about as much because society doesnt appreciate male youths as much.
This hebegynophilia is why teen girls can grt away with murder.
>This point should have been publicly raised in like fucking 2008, but that would require America to not be a feminist police state.Its not feminism. Its Puritanism. America has been poisoned by Puritan ohilosopy since the seventeenth century.
As for robotoc sex dolls, theyre pathologised because "muh incels" and plain old "loserdom".
I would prefer sex dolls over actual women, especially teenage girls.
You dont have to pay for them constantly theyre quiet and can be stashed away.