>>2434>Capitalism is generating atomize peopleBut only men are sexless. And incels is a very recent phenomena, barely a decade old. it doesn't really have a lot to do with captialism.
>You mean women are forced into doing this by economic coercion. Haha no, these sex workers can get a regular job just like the 99% of the rest of prole women.
For the most part sex workers choose to sell sex because it's easier and more lucrative.
>You refuted your self, capitalism can commodify sex.I said they're commodifying pseudo sex because prostitution is banned.
>but first and foremost socialists seek to create a stable economic situation for all people so that nobody is forced into prostitution. Niqqa IDGAF about your childish socialist savior parables. You are not right because Socialist Superman is going to save us all one day LMAO.
>Socialists are not trying to do that, That's precisely what you are doing. Sex workers are not capitalist, markets =/= capitalism, read a goddamn book.
>Socialists just seek to keep the capitalists out of the bedroom.Cops, pimps, criminals and deadbeat Johns exploit sex workers more than a corporate boss ever could.
And you support this state of affairs all while draping yourself in the flag of moral righteousness. DISGUSTING!
>Typical liberal idealism, trying to make mental contortions to ignore the effects of capitalism on society.Men can't buy sex because it's illegal and have no outlet for sexual gratification like women do. POINT TO THE IDEALISM IN THIS STATEMENT.
>There are always capital interests behind fucked up social relations.>Capitalism, capitalism, capitalismProstitution is already legal in many countries. Social relations are fucked up in this regard because of laws and idealism like feminism and protestant sexual mores.
>You are just a liberal, you have the exact same talking points and political line.Legalized prostitution is not a "liberal" position. What mainstream attempts have you seen by liberals to legalize sex work. That's what I thought.
>you are saying that men are being "liberated" by "sex work".Yes, because it would level the playing field in getting sex. Women AND men could have sex easily available, instead of just women.
>I want to stress again that you supporting the same political positions as the liberals is extremely suspicious,I want to stress you have zero substantial evidence that this is liberal position. Name me one liberal politician or group of any prominence that has mounted a serious campaign to legalize sex work.
>Socialists are opposed to prostitution because monetizing sex grants the bourgeoisie power over sex,You continue to ignore Germany and the fact that this didn't happen.
>It's the result of divide and conquer being used to maintain the extremist level of wealth inequality. Men vs women blah blah blahYou are absolutely spooked feminist fairy tales of poor women having to hook on the corner to put food in their children's mouths.
When it's primarily middle class women who hook because you have to be ATTRACTIVE to make a living at this. And poor people tend to be unattractive because they do not have the means to pay for self care to the degree a middle class person would.
If anything legal sex work would HELP many poor women because they could do that instead of a brutalizing low wage job which would put upward pressure on wages for all workers.
And no, legal sex work in Germany did not lead to a corporate take over of the sex market and women getting paid minimum wage to fuck guys. It remains a cottage industry with most of the money going to the sex workers themselves.
>It's the result of divide and conquer being used to maintain the extremist level of wealth inequality. Men vs women Lol, relationships in Germany where sex work is legal didn't become "unwholesome" "degrading" or "alienating". And gender relations are 1000x more poisoned here in the US than in Germany.
TL;DR THIS NIQQA STILL WON'T ADDRESS THE FACT THAT NONE OF HIS MORAL PANIC HORROR STORIES HAPPENED WHEN GERMANY LEGALIZED SEX WORK